Title: Laadbeloning vs Joulo: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/laadbeloning-vs-joulo/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-11-04
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# Laadbeloning vs Joulo

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadbeloning is estimated to leave you with the most (€351 net, indicative). Note: Laadbeloning deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference may be smaller or reversed. But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [Laadbeloning Annual € 320 to 390 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)
-   [Joulo Quarterly € 300 to 360](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/joulo/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put Laadbeloning and Joulo side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: November 7, 2026 at 06:53

## Side by side

|  | [Laadbeloning](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/) | [Joulo](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/joulo/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15%Extra costs at Laadbeloning, besides 15%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Annual audit fee per charger: €9.99 (Basis), €4.99 (Comfort), €0 (Compleet), deducted from the payout [source](https://laadbeloning.nl/) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | 20% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €300 - €360 |
| Payout | Annual | Quarterly |
| When | In principle at the end of Q1 of the year after the charging year, once the proceeds have been received. | Quarterly, at the latest 30 days after the quarter in which the EREs were accepted, sold and paid for; you get a message and the amount goes automatically to the IBAN in your profile, with no approval step. First payout after release 2 of the NEa register; the NEa decides when that comes. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private, Business, HOA |
| Trust score | [7.1/10 · Good](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | [9.0/10 · Strong](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/joulo/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | No Extra costs, but shown next to the price | No No costs beyond the headline price |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### Laadbeloning strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission for longer terms (down to 10%)
-   ✓ Cancellable monthly after the first term

Watch-outs

-   \- Rates excl. VAT, plus an audit fee of up to €9.99 a year
-   \- Multi-year package: exclusive mandate for 2 or 3 years
-   \- You upload a charging-session export once a year

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)

### Joulo strengths

-   ✓ Quarterly payout
-   ✓ Commission falls yearly to 17%, to 10% with referrals
-   ✓ Cancel free of charge, also in year one, ending at the latest one month later

Watch-outs

-   \- Without choosing immediate termination, cancellation takes effect on 31 December
-   \- Switching to another provider is only possible from 1 January; after an immediate termination nobody can book the rest of that year's kWh for that EAN

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/joulo/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)