Title: Laadbeloning vs PowerD: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/laadbeloning-vs-powerd/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-11-04
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# Laadbeloning vs PowerD

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadbeloning is estimated to leave you with the most (€351 net, indicative). Note: Laadbeloning deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference may be smaller or reversed. But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [Laadbeloning Annual € 320 to 390 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)
-   [PowerD After sale € 280 to 340 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerd/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put Laadbeloning and PowerD side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: November 7, 2026 at 06:53

## Side by side

|  | [Laadbeloning](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/) | [PowerD](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerd/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15%Extra costs at Laadbeloning, besides 15%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Annual audit fee per charger: €9.99 (Basis), €4.99 (Comfort), €0 (Compleet), deducted from the payout [source](https://laadbeloning.nl/) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | 25%Extra costs at PowerD, besides 25%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Possible extra charges if verification or NEa costs rise substantially, extra admin after changes, or new legal duties (art. 14.4) [source](https://powerd.nl/ere-voorwaarden) Costs of a verification rejected because rules changed are borne by the customer (art. 9.6) [source](https://powerd.nl/ere-voorwaarden) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerd/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €280 - €340 |
| Payout | Annual | After sale |
| When | In principle at the end of Q1 of the year after the charging year, once the proceeds have been received. | No fixed timeframe: PowerD aims to sell several times a year and pays out once proceeds are received. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private |
| Trust score | [7.1/10 · Good](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | [6.1/10 · Fair](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerd/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | No Extra costs, but shown next to the price | Yes Extra costs found only in the terms |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### Laadbeloning strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission for longer terms (down to 10%)
-   ✓ Cancellable monthly after the first term

Watch-outs

-   \- Rates excl. VAT, plus an audit fee of up to €9.99 a year
-   \- Multi-year package: exclusive mandate for 2 or 3 years
-   \- You upload a charging-session export once a year

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)

### PowerD strengths

-   ✓ No tacit renewal

Watch-outs

-   \- Terms allow extra charges and yearly rate changes
-   \- No fixed payout timeframe

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerd/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)