Title: Laadbeloning vs Stekker: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/laadbeloning-vs-stekker/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-11-04
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# Laadbeloning vs Stekker

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadbeloning and Stekker are estimated to leave you with the same amount (€351 net, indicative). Note: Laadbeloning deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference is in payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [Laadbeloning Annual € 320 to 390 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)
-   [Stekker Annual € 320 to 390](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put Laadbeloning and Stekker side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: November 7, 2026 at 06:53

## Side by side

|  | [Laadbeloning](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/) | [Stekker](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15%Extra costs at Laadbeloning, besides 15%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Annual audit fee per charger: €9.99 (Basis), €4.99 (Comfort), €0 (Compleet), deducted from the payout [source](https://laadbeloning.nl/) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | 15% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €320 - €390 |
| Payout | Annual | Annual |
| When | In principle at the end of Q1 of the year after the charging year, once the proceeds have been received. | Per the terms (art. 7.6) as a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year. The sign-up form and support page say quarterly payout from 2027, with first payouts expected at the end of 2026. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private, Business, HOA |
| Trust score | [7.1/10 · Good](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/#vertrouwensscore) | [9.1/10 · Strong](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | No Extra costs, but shown next to the price | No No costs beyond the headline price |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### Laadbeloning strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission for longer terms (down to 10%)
-   ✓ Cancellable monthly after the first term

Watch-outs

-   \- Rates excl. VAT, plus an audit fee of up to €9.99 a year
-   \- Multi-year package: exclusive mandate for 2 or 3 years
-   \- You upload a charging-session export once a year

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbeloning/)

### Stekker strengths

-   ✓ Publishes a log of its ERE sales

Watch-outs

-   \- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
-   \- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due
-   \- Sign-up form says quarterly payout; the terms (art. 7.6) say annually in Q1

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)