Title: PowerFlow vs Stekker: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/powerflow-vs-stekker/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-10-21
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# PowerFlow vs Stekker

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, PowerFlow and Stekker are estimated to leave you with the same amount (€520 net, indicative). Note: PowerFlow deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference is in payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [PowerFlow Quarterly € 470 to 570 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerflow/)
-   [Stekker Annual € 470 to 570](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put PowerFlow and Stekker side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: October 21, 2026 at 06:02

## Side by side

|  | [PowerFlow](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerflow/) | [Stekker](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15%Extra costs at PowerFlow, besides 15%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Sales costs are deducted from proceeds on top of the commission (art. 8.2) [source](https://powerflowgroup.nl/algemene-voorwaarden.pdf) Business: extra verification, audit, investigation and administration costs may be charged without prior consent (art. 7.3) [source](https://powerflowgroup.nl/algemene-voorwaarden.pdf) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerflow/#vertrouwensscore) | 15% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €470 - €570 | €470 - €570 |
| Payout | Quarterly | Annual |
| When | First payout 4 to 6 weeks after verification of the charging volume, then quarterly (FAQ). Per the terms (art. 8.4) after sale and receipt; PowerFlow may hold a reserve. | As a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year (first payouts Q1 2027); earlier payout only on a best-effort basis. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business, HOA |
| Trust score | [6.0/10 · Fair](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerflow/#vertrouwensscore) | [9.1/10 · Strong](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | Yes Extra costs found only in the terms | No No costs beyond the headline price |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### PowerFlow strengths

-   ✓ Quarterly payout
-   ✓ Lower rate for SMEs and HOAs (14%), large business from 12.5%
-   ✓ Private customers can cancel monthly after the first renewal

Watch-outs

-   \- Sales costs are deducted on top of the commission
-   \- PowerFlow may hold back a reserve on payouts
-   \- After cancelling, only EREs already booked and sold are paid

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/powerflow/)

### Stekker strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission with credits (down to 10%)
-   ✓ Publishes a log of its ERE sales

Watch-outs

-   \- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
-   \- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)