Title: Stekker vs GridCredits: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/stekker-vs-gridcredits/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-11-04
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# Stekker vs GridCredits

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Stekker is estimated to leave you with the most (€351 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [Stekker Annual € 320 to 390](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)
-   [GridCredits Quarterly € 300 to 370 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/gridcredits/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put Stekker and GridCredits side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: November 7, 2026 at 06:53

## Side by side

|  | [Stekker](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/) | [GridCredits](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/gridcredits/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15% | 19%Extra costs at GridCredits, besides 19%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. Possible CPO charges for data delivery ('rarely applicable') [source](https://gridcredits.nl/tarieven/) Work outside the standard scope requested by the NEa, agreed in advance [source](https://gridcredits.nl/tarieven/) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/gridcredits/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €300 - €370 |
| Payout | Annual | Quarterly |
| When | Per the terms (art. 7.6) as a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year. The sign-up form and support page say quarterly payout from 2027, with first payouts expected at the end of 2026. | Quarterly via Joulo, within 30 days after the quarter. For the first payment GridCredits deliberately gives no fixed term: it depends on the NEa and the sale. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business |
| Trust score | [9.1/10 · Strong](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/#vertrouwensscore) | [7.4/10 · Good](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/gridcredits/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | No No costs beyond the headline price | No Extra costs, but shown next to the price |
| NEa list | Yes | No |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### Stekker strengths

-   ✓ Publishes a log of its ERE sales

Watch-outs

-   \- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
-   \- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due
-   \- Sign-up form says quarterly payout; the terms (art. 7.6) say annually in Q1

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

### GridCredits strengths

-   ✓ Quarterly payout
-   ✓ Lower commission with referrals (down to 15%)

Watch-outs

-   \- Possible data costs from your CPO or manufacturer

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/gridcredits/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)