Title: Stekker vs LaadBalans: ERE earnings and terms compared
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/stekker-vs-laadbalans/
Language: en
Last modified: 2026-10-21
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

Comparison

# Stekker vs LaadBalans

## Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Stekker is estimated to leave you with the most (€520 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.

Charged at home per year

4,000kWh

Net per year, indicative

-   [Stekker Annual € 470 to 570](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)
-   [LaadBalans Annual € 440 to 540 \+ costs, not in this amount](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbalans/)

[Compare all providers](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/?kwh=4000)

We put Stekker and LaadBalans side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Last updated: October 21, 2026 at 06:02

## Side by side

|  | [Stekker](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/) | [LaadBalans](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbalans/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Pricing model | 15% | 20%Extra costs at LaadBalans, besides 20%: \+ costs These costs are not in the headline rate. NEa or transaction costs are deducted from proceeds before the commission; the amount is not stated [source](https://laadbalans.nl/prijzen) [See it in the trust breakdown →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbalans/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €470 - €570 | €440 - €540 |
| Payout | Annual | Annual |
| When | As a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year (first payouts Q1 2027); earlier payout only on a best-effort basis. | Per the terms annually, within 30 days of the annual statement; the website says quarterly. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business |
| Trust score | [9.1/10 · Strong](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/#vertrouwensscore) | [7.1/10 · Good](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbalans/#vertrouwensscore) |
| Hidden fees | No No costs beyond the headline price | No Extra costs, but shown next to the price |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

### Stekker strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission with credits (down to 10%)
-   ✓ Publishes a log of its ERE sales

Watch-outs

-   \- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
-   \- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/)

### LaadBalans strengths

-   ✓ Lower commission for longer terms (down to 15%)
-   ✓ No tacit renewal

Watch-outs

-   \- Per its terms, REV account still being applied for
-   \- Site: quarterly; terms: annual payout
-   \- Multi-year contract cannot be cancelled early

[View provider →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadbalans/)

## See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

[Compare all providers →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)