Title: Best ERE provider for high-mileage drivers (2026)
Canonical: https://erevergelijken.eu/en/ere-for/high-mileage/
Language: en
Last modified: not dated in the sitemap
Source: EREVergelijken.eu (the ERE Team), CC BY 4.0 for the data

For high-mileage drivers

# Best ERE provider for high-mileage drivers

Charge a lot - more than around 5,000 to 5,200 kWh a year - and a fixed annual fee can work out more favourably than a percentage commission, even one that looks low. At the current price, the break-even point at 15% commission sits at roughly 5,170 kWh a year; below that the commission usually wins, above it the fixed fee does. Below you can compare providers on what they actually net at your volume, not on the headline percentage alone.

Last updated: November 7, 2026 at 06:53

## What to look out for

1

### Know your own break-even point

At the current price and 15% commission, the break-even point sits at around 5,170 kWh a year. At a higher commission that point is lower.

2

### Net matters, not the headline rate

A low headline commission doesn’t tell the whole story. Extra transaction or verification costs and a lock-in period can reduce what you actually net.

3

### The break-even point tracks the price

If the ERE price rises, the break-even point in kWh falls and a fixed fee becomes attractive sooner. If the price falls, the opposite happens.

4

### Calculate with your own volume

Use your own annual mileage and consumption in the calculator, rather than relying on averages. Your own break-even point may differ from the example.

## Providers for this situation

Ranked by estimated net earnings at 4,000 kWh per year. See the full comparison for all the details.

| Provider | Pricing model | Net/year (4,000 kWh) | Payout |  |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Stekker | 15% | €320 - €390 | Annual | [View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/stekker/) |
| Groen-laden.nl | 15% (min € 34.99, max € 79.99 a year) | €320 - €390 | Annual | [View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/groen-laden/) |
| Laadnet | 20% | €300 - €360 | Quarterly (from 2027) | [View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/laadnet/) |
| Voltico | 20% | €300 - €360 | Quarterly | [View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/voltico/) |
| Joulo | 20% | €300 - €360 | Quarterly | [View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/providers/joulo/) |

At a high charging volume it’s worth putting both commission and fixed-fee providers side by side; compare them below on the net amount at your volume.

Net amounts are indicative and based on the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. This is not tax or legal advice.

## Read more

[

### Fixed fee or percentage commission: which ERE model suits you?

At low charging volumes a percentage commission usually nets more than a fixed annual fee; at higher volumes that flips. A neutral break-even table across four volume levels.

View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/knowledge-base/ere-vaste-vergoeding-versus-commissie/)[

### Gross versus net ERE earnings: how to read an offer

Gross is the market value of your EREs before deductions; net is what actually gets paid out. A worked example at 4,000 kWh a year shows the difference.

View →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/knowledge-base/bruto-versus-netto-ere-opbrengst/)

## Compare all providers

Put earnings, payout and terms side by side.

[Go to the comparison →](https://erevergelijken.eu/en/compare/)