Comparison
Lekkerladen vs PowerD
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Lekkerladen is estimated to leave you with the most (€322 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
We put Lekkerladen and PowerD side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| Lekkerladen | PowerD | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 14% to 25%, depending on usage | 25% Extra costs at PowerD, besides 25%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
|
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €290 - €350 | €280 - €340 |
| Payout | Quarterly or annual | After sale |
| When | You choose: quarterly or annually, each time after the relevant EREs have been sold. | No fixed timeframe: PowerD aims to sell several times a year and pays out once proceeds are received. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private | Private |
| Trust score | 9.0/10 · Strong | 6.1/10 · Fair |
| Hidden fees | NoNo costs beyond the headline price | YesExtra costs found only in the terms |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Lekkerladen strengths
- Choice of quarterly or annual payout
- No extra costs besides the commission
- Lower commission for a longer term and from 3,500 kWh a year (1 year down to 14%, 3 years down to 10%)
Watch-outs
- Contract (1, 2 or 3 calendar years) cannot be cancelled early
PowerD strengths
- No tacit renewal
Watch-outs
- Terms allow extra charges and yearly rate changes
- No fixed payout timeframe
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.