Comparison
LaadCash vs GridCredits
We put LaadCash and GridCredits side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms - independent and sourced.
Last updated: September 11, 2026 at 06:33
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, LaadCash is estimated to leave you with the most (€398 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
Side by side
| LaadCash | GridCredits | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 17% | 19% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €360 - €440 | €350 - €430 |
| Payout | Annual, after sale | Quarterly |
| When | Annual, after registration, sale and receipt. | Quarterly; the first payment can take 4-6 months. |
| Contract | 12 months | Unknown |
| Audience | Private | Private |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
LaadCash strengths
- Commission falls to 13%
Watch-outs
- Extra chain and acquisition costs on top of 17%
- 17% is not the total deduction
GridCredits strengths
- No signup or fixed fees
- Referrals reduce commission to 15%
Watch-outs
- Technical processing and payout via Joulo
- First payment can take 4-6 months
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.