Comparison
ERE DC vs CAPAXX Energy
Short answer
CAPAXX Energy does not publish enough to estimate net earnings reliably. Compare these two mainly on payout, contract and terms below.
We put ERE DC and CAPAXX Energy side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| ERE DC | CAPAXX Energy | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 25% | Unknown |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €410 - €510 | Unknown |
| Payout | Every six months (from 2027) | Periodic (not stated) |
| When | One payout in 2026; every six months from 2027. No date or deadline is given. | The EREs are traded and, per the site, the proceeds are paid out periodically; frequency and timing are not stated. |
| Contract | 12 months | Unknown |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private, Business, HOA |
| Trust score | 3.8/10 · Limited | 1.9/10 · Limited |
| Hidden fees | UnknownCannot be checked: price or terms not public | UnknownCannot be checked: price or terms not public |
| NEa list | No | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
ERE DC strengths
- Lower commission for longer terms (down to 15%)
- Lower commission for business (20%, 15% or 10%)
Watch-outs
- General terms are consultancy terms without ERE provisions
- Terms allow rate changes without consent
- Contracting party ERE-DC B.V. is not itself on the NEa list
CAPAXX Energy strengths
- Annual verification included (per the site)
- All of 2026 can be registered retroactively
Watch-outs
- No commission, term or payout date published
- No ERE terms; the general terms cover installation work
- No legal form or KvK number on the site
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.