Skip to main content

Comparison

Laadloon vs Xolvere

Short answer

At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadloon and Xolvere are estimated to leave you with the same amount (€490 net, indicative). Note: Xolvere deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference is in payout cadence, contract and terms below.

We put Laadloon and Xolvere side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.

Side by side

LaadloonXolvere
Pricing model20%
20%
Extra costs at Xolvere, besides 20%: + costs

These costs are not in the headline rate.

  • Broker and transaction costs may be netted into the realised sale price (or borne by Xolvere) source
See it in the trust breakdown
Net/year at 4,000 kWh€440 - €540€440 - €540
PayoutAnnualQuarterly
WhenBy default (‘Optimal’) in Q1 of the year after the charging year, as the terms also say. With ‘Direct’ your EREs go to an existing sale earlier and the money follows once that sale has been received; no fixed date is given.Quarterly; first payout expected around March 2027.
Contract12 months12 months
AudiencePrivate, BusinessPrivate, Business
Trust score9.0/10 · Strong5.6/10 · Fair
Hidden feesNoNo costs beyond the headline priceYesExtra costs found only in the terms
NEa listYesYes

Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.

Laadloon strengths

  • Consumers can cancel monthly, also in year one
  • Option of an earlier payout via ‘Direct’

Watch-outs

  • Site says 20% incl. VAT; terms say excl. VAT where VAT is due
View provider

Xolvere strengths

  • Quarterly payout
  • Commission falls yearly to 16%
  • No tacit renewal

Watch-outs

  • REV account still pending (expected end of 2026)
  • First payout expected around March 2027
View provider

See the full comparison

Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.

Compare all providers