Comparison
Lekkerladen vs Den Hartog Charging
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Lekkerladen is estimated to leave you with the most (€477 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
We put Lekkerladen and Den Hartog Charging side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| Lekkerladen | Den Hartog Charging | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 14% to 25%, depending on usage | 25% Extra costs at Den Hartog Charging, besides 25%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
|
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €430 - €530 | €410 - €510 |
| Payout | Quarterly or annual | After sale |
| When | You choose: quarterly or annually, each time after the relevant EREs have been sold. | Per the terms within 30 days of NEa acceptance, verification, sale and receipt; the portal FAQ mentions monthly around the 15th. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private | Private, Business |
| Trust score | 9.0/10 · Strong | 6.7/10 · Good |
| Hidden fees | NoNo costs beyond the headline price | YesExtra costs found only in the terms |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Lekkerladen strengths
- Choice of quarterly or annual payout
- No extra costs besides the commission
- Lower commission for a longer term and from 3,500 kWh a year (1 year down to 14%, 3 years down to 10%)
Watch-outs
- Contract (1, 2 or 3 calendar years) cannot be cancelled early
Den Hartog Charging strengths
- Lower commission for longer terms (down to 15%)
- Part of Den Hartog Energies (active 75+ years)
Watch-outs
- Costs are deducted from proceeds before commission
- No early exit; renews tacitly each year
- Payout timing differs between terms and FAQ
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.