Comparison
Laadbeloning vs PowerD
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadbeloning is estimated to leave you with the most (€351 net, indicative). Note: Laadbeloning deducts extra costs that this estimate leaves out. The difference may be smaller or reversed. But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
We put Laadbeloning and PowerD side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| Laadbeloning | PowerD | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 15% Extra costs at Laadbeloning, besides 15%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
| 25% Extra costs at PowerD, besides 25%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
|
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €280 - €340 |
| Payout | Annual | After sale |
| When | In principle at the end of Q1 of the year after the charging year, once the proceeds have been received. | No fixed timeframe: PowerD aims to sell several times a year and pays out once proceeds are received. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private |
| Trust score | 7.1/10 · Good | 6.1/10 · Fair |
| Hidden fees | NoExtra costs, but shown next to the price | YesExtra costs found only in the terms |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Laadbeloning strengths
- Lower commission for longer terms (down to 10%)
- Cancellable monthly after the first term
Watch-outs
- Rates excl. VAT, plus an audit fee of up to €9.99 a year
- Multi-year package: exclusive mandate for 2 or 3 years
- You upload a charging-session export once a year
PowerD strengths
- No tacit renewal
Watch-outs
- Terms allow extra charges and yearly rate changes
- No fixed payout timeframe
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.