Comparison
Stekker vs GridCredits
We put Stekker and GridCredits side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms - independent and sourced.
Last updated: September 11, 2026 at 06:56
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Stekker is estimated to leave you with the most (€408 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
Side by side
| Stekker | GridCredits | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 15% | 19% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €370 - €450 | €350 - €430 |
| Payout | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| When | Quarterly. | Quarterly; the first payment can take 4-6 months. |
| Contract | 12 months | Unknown |
| Audience | Private, Business | Private |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Stekker strengths
- Quarterly payout
- Bundles smart charging
- Known commission of 15%
Watch-outs
- 12-month contract term
GridCredits strengths
- No signup or fixed fees
- Referrals reduce commission to 15%
Watch-outs
- Technical processing and payout via Joulo
- First payment can take 4-6 months
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.