Comparison
Stekker vs GridCredits
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Stekker is estimated to leave you with the most (€351 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
We put Stekker and GridCredits side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| Stekker | GridCredits | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 15% | 19% Extra costs at GridCredits, besides 19%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
|
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €320 - €390 | €300 - €370 |
| Payout | Annual | Quarterly |
| When | Per the terms (art. 7.6) as a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year. The sign-up form and support page say quarterly payout from 2027, with first payouts expected at the end of 2026. | Quarterly via Joulo, within 30 days after the quarter. For the first payment GridCredits deliberately gives no fixed term: it depends on the NEa and the sale. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business |
| Trust score | 9.1/10 · Strong | 7.4/10 · Good |
| Hidden fees | NoNo costs beyond the headline price | NoExtra costs, but shown next to the price |
| NEa list | Yes | No |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Stekker strengths
- Publishes a log of its ERE sales
Watch-outs
- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due
- Sign-up form says quarterly payout; the terms (art. 7.6) say annually in Q1
GridCredits strengths
- Quarterly payout
- Lower commission with referrals (down to 15%)
Watch-outs
- Possible data costs from your CPO or manufacturer
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.