Comparison
Stekker vs LaadBalans
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Stekker is estimated to leave you with the most (€520 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
We put Stekker and LaadBalans side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms, independent and sourced.
Side by side
| Stekker | LaadBalans | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 15% | 20% Extra costs at LaadBalans, besides 20%: + costsThese costs are not in the headline rate.
|
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €470 - €570 | €440 - €540 |
| Payout | Annual | Annual |
| When | As a rule in Q1 of the year after the charging year (first payouts Q1 2027); earlier payout only on a best-effort basis. | Per the terms annually, within 30 days of the annual statement; the website says quarterly. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business |
| Trust score | 9.1/10 · Strong | 7.1/10 · Good |
| Hidden fees | NoNo costs beyond the headline price | NoExtra costs, but shown next to the price |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Stekker strengths
- Lower commission with credits (down to 10%)
- Publishes a log of its ERE sales
Watch-outs
- 25% commission when combined with smart charging
- Terms: commission excl. VAT where VAT is due
LaadBalans strengths
- Lower commission for longer terms (down to 15%)
- No tacit renewal
Watch-outs
- Per its terms, REV account still being applied for
- Site: quarterly; terms: annual payout
- Multi-year contract cannot be cancelled early
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.