Comparison
Laadbeloning vs Joulo
We put Laadbeloning and Joulo side by side on pricing model, estimated net earnings, payout and terms - independent and sourced.
Last updated: September 11, 2026 at 06:58
Short answer
At 4,000 kWh per year, Laadbeloning is estimated to leave you with the most (€408 net, indicative). But there is more to it than the amount: also weigh payout cadence, contract and terms below.
Side by side
| Laadbeloning | Joulo | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | 15% | 20% |
| Net/year at 4,000 kWh | €370 - €450 | €350 - €420 |
| Payout | Annual | Quarterly |
| When | Typically at the end of Q1 of the following calendar year. | Quarterly. |
| Contract | 12 months | 12 months |
| Audience | Private, Business, HOA | Private, Business |
| NEa list | Yes | Yes |
Net amounts are indicative, based on 4,000 kWh per year and the current ERE market price. An NEa listing is not an approval. Always check the current terms with the provider.
Laadbeloning strengths
- Known commission of 15%
- Listed on the NEa register
- Suitable for private individuals
Watch-outs
- Annual payout
- 12-month contract term
Joulo strengths
- Strong technical integration across many charger brands
- Quarterly payout
Watch-outs
- Higher commission of 20%
See the full comparison
Put every ERE provider side by side on earnings and terms.